savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-hackers] address@hidden: Re: Spelling errors in the GNU site]


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] address@hidden: Re: Spelling errors in the GNU site]
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:24:08 -0700 (MST)

Savannah hackers, could you please give him an account as a webmaster?
Webmasters, please take note.  I will ask him if he would also like
to share other webmaster tasks.

------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-Authentication-Warning: irix2.gl.umbc.edu: shilde1 owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:59:11 -0500
From: Stephen Hilderbrand <address@hidden>
To: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Spelling errors in the GNU site
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Richard Stallman wrote:

>     I've noticed quite a few type-os and other spelling/grammatical mistakes
>     throughout the GNU web site.  Do you folks want someone to serve as a
>     spell/grammar checker to proofread your pages? As an avid user of GNU
>     software, I am more than willing to devote my time to GNU in this manner.
>
> Certainly we would like this.  We could make you a webmaster so that you
> can fix these directly.  Do you want to do this?

I would love the opportunity to support GNU with my time.  I believe it
is important for such a well-respected organization as GNU to be as
grammatically correct and spelling-bug-free as possible, especially when
people who speak english as a second (or third!) language are involved in
GNU efforts.  Also, in order to retain the GNU's level of professionalism,
a finer-toothed comb could be used to pick the bugs out of the
documentation.

Pardon my sick metaphor, but please take my offer to help seriously.  I
would be honored to proofread/help webmaster the GNU web site.

I've actually thought of wrapping ispell in a script (maybe in python?)
that spell checks the DocumentRoot directory downward, but have yet to
play with this idea.  It would only find spelling mistakes anyway, so for
the time being, human intervention will remain part of the proofreading
process.

Respectfully yours,
Stephen D. Hilderbrand, II

ps - thanks a heck of a lot for emacs!
------- End of forwarded message -------



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]