rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rule-list] gentoo linux and nano


From: Devon
Subject: Re: [Rule-list] gentoo linux and nano
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 22:04:32 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 07 April 2002 11:51 am, address@hidden wrote:

> I was reading this article on k5.
>
> http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/4/202113/7370
>
> About installing with gentoo. Very interesting. Much like slinky.

I believe that Slinky is far and away easier to install than Gentoo.
But, yes, the install does seem similar to a point.

> "A word of caution; get in the habit of always using the -w switch with
> nano. If you do not use the -w switch nano's word wrap feature will
> jack up your config files."
>
> Something we need to highlight.

For what it's worth, 'pico' behaves the same way. The -w flag disables 
word wrap, otherwise, word wrap is on by default.

I've disabled wordwrap (and enabled the help screens) in nano.
It's a configure option. I left word wrap and the -w flag available for 
mortal users, and disabled it for 'root'. I can also disable it across 
the board. Thoughts anyone?

I'll include the new nano in the next set of images.

By the way in the FYI department:
nano, compiled against uClibc=169k
Against glibc, you ask? 594k

Those are the striped sizes using the same config options, with the 
exception of the glibc path.

- -D

- -- 

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/

- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8sQjAeMAUbzJhSVcRAv54AJ0WOJQJtWVlyJluQFSMLVkROJQlNQCfS9Z1
nZ992Id/R44H8spe6+9lrQU=
=Dx64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]