[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] Thoughts on licensing
From: |
Devon |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] Thoughts on licensing |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:23:07 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 April 2002 05:02 pm, Martin Stricker wrote:
> Since syslinux is published under a BSD license slinky must also
> include the BSD license text, not only the GPL text! We have to honor
> all the licenses we use!
I'm not sure here, actually. Syslinux isn't actually included with
Slinky. It is used to create the boot disk, and handles the boot process.
However, the syslinux binary is not included. I've nothing against
including the BSD license, of course. I'm just curious as to how this
plays out.
Thoughts anyone?
- -D
- --
pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8q6r7eMAUbzJhSVcRAgxpAJ9UGV1uZYiZZinfrdUN3OOglxDe/ACggv42
87lczhlBMHePfW6pcYRWZzI=
=EFv4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----