[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Safe to start new backup while old increments a
Marian 'VooDooMan' Meravy
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Safe to start new backup while old increments are being removed?
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:44:28 +0100
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
first of all, I'm not a rdiff-backup guru.
On 2014-12-26 09:43, Florian Hollerweger wrote:
> I recently ran an rdiff-backup while (much) older increments were still being
> removed via --remove-older-than from the same repository. Is this safe to do?
IMO, it is safe.
My environment backs up two times a day, but before each backup it
performs --remove-older-than 4W (i.e. 4 weeks). This is done by on Linux
server by cron, and on Windows environment by task scheduler with cygwin
Recently, I needed to restore backup from like 4 days ago, and I went
IMO (but I might be wrong) rdiff-backup tracks in the meta-data files
(gzipped) which are still present to backup, and only removes those
which disappeared like (in my case) in 4 weeks. ALL IN THE LIST: correct
me if I'm wrong...
so IMO it should be fine.
so I recommend --remove-older-than like 1 week, and then immediately
backup today's backup.
E.g. If the frequency of "today's" backup is more than "remove" clause,
then you should be fine.
> Although it seems that both processes were eventually completed successfully
> without throwing any warnings or error messages, I still wanted to make sure
> I can rely on the integrity of my backup.
yes, there are no error/warning messages... try your own experiment for
like 1 hour and post your resume here.
> The same question has been asked (but not unequivocally answered) at
> rdiff-backup-users mailing list at address@hidden
> Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
Description: OpenPGP digital signature