[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QO
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QOMified |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 14:16:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 |
On 09/11/2018 13:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2018-11-09 12:29, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough
>>>> about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from
>>>> using QOM objects more.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt
>>>
>>> Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split)
>>> the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity,
>>> adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide
>>> changes. Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ...
>>
>> Tried this after studying docs:
>>
>> qemu -usb -device usb-bt-dongle -bt hci,vlan=0 -bt device:keyboard
>>
>> Segfaults right anway on first keypress.
>> I guess that qualifies as "broken and obviously unused".
>
> Thanks for checking! I guess that means we could even get rid of it
> without deprecating it first if it is broken already for more than two
> releases...?
I think what others were using bluetooth passthrough. But it's
certainly possible that it's broken.
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QOMified, (continued)