qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] i386: Add CPUID bit and feature words fo


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] i386: Add CPUID bit and feature words for IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 11:42:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 04/07/2018 11:06, Robert Hoo wrote:
> Support of IA32_PRED_CMD MSR already be enumerated by same CPUID bit as
> SPEC_CTRL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
>  target/i386/cpu.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index b0b87c3..7f787ef 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] 
> = {
>              NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>              NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>              NULL, NULL, "spec-ctrl", NULL,
> -            NULL, NULL, NULL, "ssbd",
> +            NULL, "arch-capabilities", NULL, "ssbd",
>          },
>          .cpuid_eax = 7,
>          .cpuid_needs_ecx = true, .cpuid_ecx = 0,
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> index ae97005..c2b297b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ typedef uint32_t FeatureWordArray[FEATURE_WORDS];
>  #define CPUID_7_0_EDX_AVX512_4VNNIW (1U << 2) /* AVX512 Neural Network 
> Instructions */
>  #define CPUID_7_0_EDX_AVX512_4FMAPS (1U << 3) /* AVX512 Multiply 
> Accumulation Single Precision */
>  #define CPUID_7_0_EDX_SPEC_CTRL     (1U << 26) /* Speculation Control */
> +#define CPUID_7_0_EDX_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (1U << 29)  /*Arch Capabilities*/
>  #define CPUID_7_0_EDX_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD  (1U << 31) /* Speculative Store Bypass 
> Disable */
>  
>  #define CPUID_8000_0008_EBX_IBPB    (1U << 12) /* Indirect Branch Prediction 
> Barrier */
> 

Doing this without the MSR is wrong.  We need to leave it out of
Icelake-Client/Icelake-Server.  Eduardo, should the models be marked as
non-migratable until it is in place?

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]