Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/46] tests/tcg/i386: fix test-i386-fprem

[Alex Bennée]

Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:

> On 24.04.2018 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Remove dependencies on QEMU's source tree and build directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c 
>> b/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c
>> index 1a71623204..66f5a9657d 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c
>> @@ -23,7 +23,10 @@
>>   *  along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>   */
>>
>> -#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +#include <stdint.h>
>> +
>> +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
>>
>>  /*
>>   * Inspired by <ieee754.h>'s union ieee854_long_double, but with single
>> @@ -39,7 +42,7 @@ union float80u {
>>          unsigned int exponent:15;
>>          unsigned int negative:1;
>>          unsigned int empty:16;
>> -    } QEMU_PACKED ieee;
>> +    } __attribute__((packed)) ieee;
>>
>>      /* This is for NaNs in the IEEE 854 double-extended-precision format.  
>> */
>>      struct {
>> @@ -49,7 +52,7 @@ union float80u {
>>          unsigned int exponent:15;
>>          unsigned int negative:1;
>>          unsigned int empty:16;
>> -    } QEMU_PACKED ieee_nan;
>> +    } __attribute__((packed)) ieee_nan;
>>  };
>>
>>  #define IEEE854_LONG_DOUBLE_BIAS 0x3fff
>> @@ -229,6 +232,7 @@ static void test_fprem_cases(void)
>>      do_fprem_stack_underflow();
>>
>>      printf("= invalid operation =\n");
>> +    do_fprem(q_nan.d, 1.0);
>>      do_fprem(s_nan.d, 1.0);
>>      do_fprem(1.0, 0.0);
>>      do_fprem(pos_inf.d, 1.0);
>> @@ -238,6 +242,8 @@ static void test_fprem_cases(void)
>>      do_fprem(pos_denorm.d, 1.0);
>>      do_fprem(1.0, pos_denorm.d);
>>
>> +    do_fprem(smallest_positive_norm.d, smallest_positive_norm.d);
>
> How's that change related to the patch description? ... i.e. maybe you
> should mention these changes in the patch description, too?

Yeah I'll fix that up - they got added to stop the compiler bithing
about un-used things.

>
> Apart from that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>


--
Alex Bennée