qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/46] tests/tcg/i386: fix test-i386-fprem


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/46] tests/tcg/i386: fix test-i386-fprem
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 05:26:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 24.04.2018 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Remove dependencies on QEMU's source tree and build directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c 
> b/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c
> index 1a71623204..66f5a9657d 100644
> --- a/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c
> +++ b/tests/tcg/i386/test-i386-fprem.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,10 @@
>   *  along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>   */
>  
> -#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +
> +#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
>  
>  /*
>   * Inspired by <ieee754.h>'s union ieee854_long_double, but with single
> @@ -39,7 +42,7 @@ union float80u {
>          unsigned int exponent:15;
>          unsigned int negative:1;
>          unsigned int empty:16;
> -    } QEMU_PACKED ieee;
> +    } __attribute__((packed)) ieee;
>  
>      /* This is for NaNs in the IEEE 854 double-extended-precision format.  */
>      struct {
> @@ -49,7 +52,7 @@ union float80u {
>          unsigned int exponent:15;
>          unsigned int negative:1;
>          unsigned int empty:16;
> -    } QEMU_PACKED ieee_nan;
> +    } __attribute__((packed)) ieee_nan;
>  };
>  
>  #define IEEE854_LONG_DOUBLE_BIAS 0x3fff
> @@ -229,6 +232,7 @@ static void test_fprem_cases(void)
>      do_fprem_stack_underflow();
>  
>      printf("= invalid operation =\n");
> +    do_fprem(q_nan.d, 1.0);
>      do_fprem(s_nan.d, 1.0);
>      do_fprem(1.0, 0.0);
>      do_fprem(pos_inf.d, 1.0);
> @@ -238,6 +242,8 @@ static void test_fprem_cases(void)
>      do_fprem(pos_denorm.d, 1.0);
>      do_fprem(1.0, pos_denorm.d);
>  
> +    do_fprem(smallest_positive_norm.d, smallest_positive_norm.d);

How's that change related to the patch description? ... i.e. maybe you
should mention these changes in the patch description, too?

Apart from that:

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]