Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/9] cli: add -preconfig option

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:48:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:05:41 +0200
> Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:25:08 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 02:11:09PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:  
> > [...]
> [...]
> > > > @@ -1886,6 +1895,13 @@ static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
> > > >      RunState r;
> > > >      ShutdownCause request;
> > > >  
> > > > +    if (preconfig_exit_requested) {
> > > > +        if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PRECONFIG)) {    
> > > 
> > > Is it possible to have preconfig_exit_request set outside of
> > > RUN_STATE_PRECONFIG?  When and why?  
> > preconfig_exit_requested is initialized with TRUE and
> > in combo with '-inmigrate' we need this runstate check.
> > it's the same as it was with
> >  { RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH, RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE },
> > which I probably should remove (I need to check it though)
> [...]
> 
> > > > @@ -4594,6 +4623,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> > > >      }
> > > >      parse_numa_opts(current_machine);
> > > >  
> > > > +    /* do monitor/qmp handling at preconfig state if requested */
> > > > +    main_loop();    
> > > 
> > > Wouldn't it be simpler to do "if (!preconfig) { main_loop(); }"
> > > instead of entering main_loop() just to exit immediately?  
> > The thought didn't cross my mind, it might work and more readable
> > as one doesn't have to jump into main_loop() to find out that
> > it would exit immediately.
> > I'll try to it on respin.
> Well doing as suggested end ups more messy:
> 
>     @@static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
>     ...
>     if (preconfig_exit_requested) {
>         runstate_set(RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH);                                    
>     
>         return true;
>     }
>    
>     @@main
>     /* do monitor/qmp handling at preconfig state if requested */
>     if (!preconfig_exit_requested) {
>         main_loop();
>     } else if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PRECONFIG)) {
>         runstate_set(RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH);
>     }

This doesn't make sense to me.  Why would we enter
RUN_STATE_PRECONFIG state if -preconfig is not used at all?


>     preconfig_exit_requested = false;
>     ...
> 
> I'd prefer original v4 approach, where only main_loop_should_exit()
> has to deal with state transitions and book-keeping.

If the above is unavoidable, I agree.  But I still don't
understand we have to enter PRECONFIG state if the user didn't
specify -preconfig.

-- 
Eduardo