qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qobject: replace qobject_incref/QINCREF qob


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qobject: replace qobject_incref/QINCREF qobject_decref/QDECREF
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:51:08 +0100

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 08:40 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>
>> Now that we can safely call QOBJECT() on QObject * and children types,
>> we can have a single macro to ref/unref the object.
>>
>> Change the incref/decref prefix name for the more common ref/unref.
>
>
> I know you did this by sed (for the most part); but it would be worth
> including the command line you used in the commit message to make it easier
> to reproduce the same mechanical portion of the patch when rebasing.

git sed QINCREF qobject_ref
git sed QDECREF qobject_unref
git sed qobject_incref qobject_ref
git sed qobject_decref qobject_ref

>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>> ---
>
>
>> +++ b/include/qapi/qmp/qobject.h
>
>
>> @@ -74,13 +74,16 @@ qobject_unknown_type(const void *unused)
>>       (const QObject *, x),                       \
>>       qobject_unknown_type(x))
>>   -/* High-level interface for qobject_incref() */
>> -#define QINCREF(obj)      \
>> -    qobject_incref(QOBJECT(obj))
>> +/**
>> + * qobject_ref(): Increment QObject's reference count
>> + */
>> +#define qobject_ref(x) qobject_ref_impl(QOBJECT(x))
>
>
> The meat of the patch; looks fine to me.
>
>> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/qobject.cocci
>> @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
>>   expression Obj, Key, E;
>>   @@
>>   (
>> -- qobject_incref(QOBJECT(E));
>> -+ QINCREF(E);
>> +- qobject_ref(QOBJECT(E));
>> ++ qobject_ref(E);
>>   |
>> -- qobject_decref(QOBJECT(E));
>> -+ QDECREF(E);
>> +- qobject_unref(QOBJECT(E));
>> ++ qobject_unref(E);
>
>
> I wonder if these branches should just be removed; they made sense when we
> had two spellings, but after your mass conversion, the .cocci script is
> unlikely to ever find regressions on this front.

They would still remove extra cast, wouldn't they?

thanks



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]