qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 4/5] target-arm: Add support for PMU register


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 4/5] target-arm: Add support for PMU register PMINTENSET_EL1
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:41:21 +0000

On 3 February 2017 at 15:19, Wei Huang <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/03/2017 07:30 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 31 January 2017 at 15:15, Wei Huang <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> This patch adds access support for PMINTENSET_EL1.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  target/arm/cpu.h    |  2 +-
>>>  target/arm/helper.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
>>> index ce02044..42aaea9 100644
>>> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
>>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
>>> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
>>>          uint64_t c9_pmxevtyper; /* perf monitor event type */
>>>          uint32_t c9_pmuserenr; /* perf monitor user enable */
>>>          uint64_t c9_pmselr; /* perf monitor counter selection register */
>>> -        uint32_t c9_pminten; /* perf monitor interrupt enables */
>>> +        uint64_t c9_pminten; /* perf monitor interrupt enables */
>>>          union { /* Memory attribute redirection */
>>>              struct {
>>>  #ifdef HOST_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
>>> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
>>> index 6b8460a..b028042 100644
>>> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
>>> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
>>> @@ -1272,9 +1272,17 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo v7_cp_reginfo[] = {
>>>        .writefn = pmuserenr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write },
>>>      { .name = "PMINTENSET", .cp = 15, .crn = 9, .crm = 14, .opc1 = 0, 
>>> .opc2 = 1,
>>>        .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tpm,
>>> -      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pminten),
>>> +      .type = ARM_CP_ALIAS,
>>> +      .fieldoffset = offsetoflow32(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pminten),
>>>        .resetvalue = 0,
>>>        .writefn = pmintenset_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write },
>>> +    { .name = "PMINTENSET_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
>>> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 9, .crm = 14, .opc2 = 1,
>>> +      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tpm,
>>> +      .type = ARM_CP_IO,
>>> +      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pminten),
>>> +      .writefn = pmintenset_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write,
>>> +      .resetvalue = 0x0 },
>>>      { .name = "PMINTENCLR", .cp = 15, .crn = 9, .crm = 14, .opc1 = 0, 
>>> .opc2 = 2,
>>>        .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tpm, .type = ARM_CP_ALIAS,
>>>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pminten),
>>
>> Add PMINTENCLR_EL1 as well, please.
>
> It was already defined in target-arm/helper.c file. Could you elaborate
> which part is missing?
>
>     { .name = "PMINTENCLR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
>       .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 9, .crm = 14, .opc2 = 2,
>       .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tpm, .type = ARM_CP_ALIAS,
>       .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c9_pminten),
>       .writefn = pmintenclr_write },

I'm sorry, you're right. I assumed that because we didn't have
a 64-bit version of the SET we didn't have a 64-bit version
of the CLR either.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]