[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?
From: |
Michael Tokarev |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:26:57 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131103 Icedove/17.0.10 |
14.04.2014 17:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
[]
>>> * win64 virtio-scsi regression
>>
>> In the absence of any patches here I think we should deem
>> win64 virtio-scsi sufficiently minor that it will get
>> fixed in 2.0.1.
>
> The patch is at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/264111/raw
> if you want to apply it.
This apparently fixes both reported issues - this win64 virtio-scsi regression
(for sure) and also winXP with -no-acpi boot prob reported elsewhere (but for
this I'm not 100% sure, since I don't have a good reproducer).
FWIW.
/mjt
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/04/12
Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?, Peter Maydell, 2014/04/14
Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?,
Michael Tokarev <=