Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 7

[Andreas Färber]

Am 06.02.2012 20:25, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

I had some follow-up questions to the last call that remained
unanswered. We don't really need a call for that though, email is fine.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-01/msg04065.html

How is the realize step (DeviceState::init) supposed to translate to
Object-derived classes (e.g., CPU) and where to draw the line between
initfn and realize.

For virtual methods Anthony outlined the intended scheme here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-02/msg00622.html
(Derived classes should save the parent's function pointer in their own
Class and initialize it from the parent class' function pointer.)

Another topic that can be answered by email is what the time planning
for the 4th QOM series looks like. Are there things that developers of
new devices should keep in mind / start doing differently wrt SysBus?

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg