[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:48:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > I've spent the past few months working on C++ integration for QEMU. I'm
> > more
> > convinced than ever that we desperately in need of structured object
> > oriented
> > mechanisms to be successful but am pretty strongly convinced that
> > incremental
> > additional of C++ is not going to be successful.
>
> Agree. I doubt switching to C++ will fly. But using glib has pretty
> good chances to be a big success long-term.
>
Why is everyone so pessimistic on switching to C++?
Anthony: considering that you have direct experience on trying to do
this, why are you convinced it is not going to work?
I am asking because I have always found the glib GObject stuff a little
ugly compared to well written C++ code (of course you can write ugly
code in any language if you want to).
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib, Anthony Liguori, 2011/01/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2011/01/25
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib, Gerd Hoffmann, 2011/01/25
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib, Aurelien Jarno, 2011/01/25
Message not available
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Introduce hard dependency on glib, Johannes Stezenbach, 2011/01/26