[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?
From: |
Gleb Natapov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:57:51 +0300 |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:54:26AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 02:59 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:53:27AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>>Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel
> >>>lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth
> >>>trying.
> >>Didn't try win7, but for winxp it is a *huge* difference.
> >>
> >On which HW? My guess is this is because of tpr patching.
>
> Does Windows 7 hit the TPR heavily? I thought all modern versions
> of Windows significantly reduced their interactions with the TPR.
>
Windows 7 doesn't. tpr patching explains only winxp slowdown.
--
Gleb.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu?, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/25
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, walt, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Gerd Hoffmann, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Gleb Natapov, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Gerd Hoffmann, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Alexander Graf, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Gleb Natapov, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?,
Gleb Natapov <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, walt, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/29