qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:47 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2

 On 08/27/2010 12:57 AM, walt wrote:

Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth trying.

Using that flag wipes out the difference entirely: both come in at about 65 seconds.

I also tried xp-32 running on the same two kvm64 virtual machines, with slightly
different results:

qemu-kvm: 35 seconds (65 seconds using -no-kvm-irqchip, a huge disadvantage)
qemu:      58 seconds

Anything unexpected in these results?

Looks like kernel irqchip is the cause for the difference, which isn't too surprising.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]