|
From: | Avi Kivity |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? |
Date: | Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:47 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
On 08/27/2010 12:57 AM, walt wrote:
Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's worth trying.Using that flag wipes out the difference entirely: both come in at about 65 seconds.I also tried xp-32 running on the same two kvm64 virtual machines, with slightlydifferent results:qemu-kvm: 35 seconds (65 seconds using -no-kvm-irqchip, a huge disadvantage)qemu: 58 seconds Anything unexpected in these results?
Looks like kernel irqchip is the cause for the difference, which isn't too surprising.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |