[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClib
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.) |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:38:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-17-generic; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) |
On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 2/20/10, Rob Landley <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
> > sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is sparc
> > using software emulated floating point at the kernel level and that's
> > configured as a module? (Except I don't think busybox ls uses floating
> > point...)
>
> Sparc32 is not maintained anymore so maybe it broke at some point.
> There was some discussion a few years ago.
Not maintained on the Linux kernel side, or not maintained under qemu? It
seems to be working under debian, but the 2.6.18 kernel is from 2006.
> > Do any sparc people understand what's going on here? My next step is to
> > grab a 2.6.18 kernel and try to get _that_ to work with the tweaked
> > debian config (and an ext2 root filesystem since squashfs wasn't merged
> > back then and had a format change when it was merged). But I'm mostly
> > flailing around blind here...
>
> I'm also trying different kernels using my .config. But already 2.6.12
> hangs in ESP probe.
I've got 2.6.32 booting to a command prompt (albeit with serial console and
intentionall restricted set of hardware). But then it misbehaves.
I'll try getting 2.6.18 to build with a known .config, and then bisect forward
if that seems to work...
Thanks,
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Rob Landley, 2010/02/18
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/02/18
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Rob Landley, 2010/02/18
- [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/02/18
- [Qemu-devel] Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Rob Landley, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Blue Swirl, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.),
Rob Landley <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Blue Swirl, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Rob Landley, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., Rob Landley, 2010/02/21
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., David Miller, 2010/02/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, 2010/02/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., Rob Landley, 2010/02/21
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., David Miller, 2010/02/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Blue Swirl, 2010/02/20