qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/15] monitor: Handle new and old style handler


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 05/15] monitor: Handle new and old style handlers
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:42:47 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)

Luiz Capitulino wrote:
This commit changes monitor_handle_command() to support old style
_and_ new style handlers.

New style handlers are protocol independent, they return their
data to the Monitor, which in turn decides how to print them
(ie. user protocol vs. machine protocol).

Converted handlers will use the 'user_print' member of 'mon_cmd_t'
to define its user protocol function, which will be called to print
data in the user protocol format.

Handlers which don't have 'user_print' defined are not converted
and are handled as usual.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden>
---
 monitor.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 9d4c168..c0ba5ee 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ static int monitor_fprintf(FILE *stream, const char *fmt, 
...)
     return 0;
 }

+static inline int monitor_handler_ported(const mon_cmd_t *cmd)
+{
+    return cmd->user_print != NULL;
+}
+
 static int compare_cmd(const char *name, const char *list)
 {
     const char *p, *pstart;
@@ -3053,17 +3058,32 @@ static void monitor_handle_command(Monitor *mon, const 
char *cmdline)
     qdict = qdict_new();

     cmd = monitor_parse_command(mon, cmdline, qdict);
-    if (cmd) {
-        void (*handler)(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict);
+    if (!cmd)
+        goto out;
+
+    qemu_errors_to_mon(mon);

-        qemu_errors_to_mon(mon);
+    if (monitor_handler_ported(cmd)) {
+        QObject *data = NULL;
+        void (*handler_new)(Monitor *mon, const QDict *params,
+                            QObject **ret_data);

Screams to be a typedef.

-        handler = cmd->handler;
-        handler(mon, qdict);
+        handler_new = cmd->handler;
+        handler_new(mon, qdict, &data);

At this point, couldn't cmd->handler be a union so we had a bit more type safety?

--
Regards,

Anthony Liguori





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]