|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KQEMU code organization |
Date: | Thu, 29 May 2008 12:47:12 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) |
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jamie Lokier wrote:Virtio on x86 requires no special host-kernel support, IIRC. But, yeah,in-kernel irqchip (including APIC) is a further incentive to motivate such step. But - this is all nice on the drawing board. It just requires a reasonable balance between required effort (wouldn't be small, I guess) and future relevance. For x86, by AMD and Intel at least (not sure about VIA right now),
As of the recently announced Isaiah microarchitecture, VIA includes support for VT.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
you see hardware virtualization in every new processor. So kqemu becomes less and less relevant over the time. The thrilling question is: Is that period long enough to justify a kqemu / soft-kvm, and to push the result mainline? Jan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |