Re: [Protux-devel] Mustux MUE - Mustux Undo Engine - First formal approach

[Remon Sijrier]

On Monday 17 May 2004 14:40, Luciano Giordana wrote:
> Just quick answers : details later (little time now)
>
> - I dont agree with the multi-stack, one for each viewport. I think you
> meant one for each SONG, since view ports would only look to the different
> parts of same song. But, essentially, for a mono-view app , such protux,
> you are correct. (hey...why not multiview in protux... intersting...)

Ehm, thats what I said ;-)
Each Song (== ViewPort) has its own Stack.

>
> > I don't get one thing here. Anti actions are (hard) linked to Objects. In
>
> case
> you restart a MustuxApplication, the "undo" stack is loaded into
> memory, but
> how do all the actions/antiactions know on what Object they apply since the
> relation is broken to these Objects?
>
> - After desserialization, you link objects propertly, even if the objects
> addresses are different. Thats is the very essence of serialization. Not
> simple to code thou.

Is there no other way to do this more robustly?

I was also very interested in the "Contextual Undo" 
Nobody else have some opinion on this?


Greetings,

Remon