[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server
From: |
Travis |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:34:19 -0800 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duncan" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 06:45 AM
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server
> Phil Grundig <address@hidden> posted
> address@hidden, excerpted below, on Tue, 13
> Jan 2009 10:56:06 +0000:
>
>> Checkboxes/ticks to disable/enable a server would be an entirely
>> sensible (and obvious) usability feature to add.
>>
>> I certainly never would have guessed the '0' connection limit thing, if
>> it works that is.
>
> It doesn't... unless the feature was added for 0.133 and not put in the
> changelog or something. Unfortunately... as it'd be nice...
>
>> Deleting a server also means the entire newsgroup
>> list has to be downloaded again when the server is re-added, since Pan
>> must simply delete the list!
>
> What I'd do would be create a couple script thats switched out the
> server.xml file, between one with all servers active, and one with
> whichever server disabled, then (optionally) start pan. Then with pan
> shutdown, simply run one or the other script to switch-in whichever
> server list. If the option to start pan is included, one can then
> replace whatever current pan menu entries or whatever with entries for
> the scripts, after which you can invoke whichever one you like. (Without
> the option, one would just run the switcher script when necessary, and
> start pan normally.)
>
> Actually, the question has come up before, and after I suggested the zero
> connection thing and it didn't work, that's what I suggested next. Note
> that it's possible a few other files may have to be switched out at the
> same time to keep pan in sync. I don't think it should need any but the
> one, but I've not actually tried it, so I can't say for sure.
>
>> And syscntl tweaking could have undesired effects on other connections
>> for other apps and seems a bit crude.
>>
>> So: two feature requests (could these be passed on?):
>>
>> 1. Checkboxes/ticks to disable/enable a server.
>
> As I said, this has come up before. I believe Charles is aware of the
> request. However, it would be a good idea to check the pan bugzilla for
> a feature request bug on it and file one if there's not one yet filed.
> As with many devs, Charles doesn't keep very close tabs on the lists, and
> prefers such feature requests be filed in the bug tracking system so they
> don't get lost.
>
> If you file a bug, you can note this thread as archived on gmane. Here's
> the thread origin post:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pan.user/10685
>
> Similarly, you can then post the bug URL here so there's links both ways.
>
If the issue is "Temporarily dead server" why not just wait for the temporary
situation to resolve?
--
Travis in Shoreline Washington
[Pan-users] Re: Temporarily dead server, Bruce Bowler, 2009/01/13