|
From: | David Kelly |
Subject: | Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage |
Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:36:32 -0500 |
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:17 AM, Csv4Me2 wrote:
Yeah, I second that. Handling extremely groups should be possible on machines with a small memory footprint, say 512 Mb. That will probably mean a majoroverhaul in how pan manages loading, sorting and aggregating all those multiparts. And perhaps Charles will make that choice, I hope he does.
How many years ago was the discussion centering on using a SQL database to handle the metadata? :-)
On-disk storage would solve the memory footprint problem but come at the price of much slower response time.
I think you should try 0.14.2.91 and find 2e6 to 2.5e6 messages was about the limit with a 2GB process size limit. 0.114 is two to three times more efficient. So at least one "major overhaul" has recently happened. Thanks Charles!
-- David Kelly N4HHE, address@hidden ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |