[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage
From: |
Csv4Me2 |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:41:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 07:26, fred wrote:
> Hey Charles
>
> I am using 0.114 and still using up tons of memory 1.9gb/2.0gb + 4gb of
> swap. Trying to get all the headers for A.B.dvd from giganews.
> FC5,2.6.17-1.2187_FC5smp, once it hits the end of the swap it just stops
> responing. It compiled without error and make check passed. Any
> suggestions?
>
> Thanks
> Lazlow
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pan-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
What do you expect from a group with 30.000.000+ messsages ?
Giganews retention period of three months or more isn't always a blessing, or
even necessary.
When I downloaded all the headers (3G of headers alone) of that group pan
eventually built a single group file of 1750 M !!!, and it's all stored in
core just before that :-)
Not a bug but reaching the physical limits of your box, I guess.
my 2 cents
C
- [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage, fred, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage,
Csv4Me2 <=
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage, fred, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage, Csv4Me2, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage, David Kelly, 2006/09/27
- [Pan-users] Testers wanted: memory reduction patch for alt.binaries, Charles Kerr, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Testers wanted: memory reduction patch for alt.binaries, fred, 2006/09/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Testers wanted: memory reduction for alt.binaries, Charles Kerr, 2006/09/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Testers wanted: memory reduction for alt.binaries, fred, 2006/09/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Testers wanted: memory reduction for alt.binaries, Charles Kerr, 2006/09/28
- Re: [Pan-users] Testers wanted: memory reduction for alt.binaries, fred, 2006/09/28
- [Pan-users] Memory update: using 55% less memory than 0.114..., Charles Kerr, 2006/09/28