[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Pan email snag
From: |
Brian Morrison |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Pan email snag |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:12:33 +0000 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:42:09 +0100 in
address@hidden Torstein Sunde
<address@hidden> wrote:
> An alternative could be an option to specify separate profiles for
> news an email when using "Followup and Reply", but I guess that's more
> complicated. Besides, the method suggested by Brian also encourages
> using a valid "Reply-To" when using an invalid "From". To my
> knowledge, the spam robots usually ignore "Reply-To".
The reason for that is that Reply-To cannot be harvested using XOVER,
you have to get the whole article body. Hence spammers find it expensive
in terms of time and effort.
- --
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+YQYh9BNjUd4y5cURAu+kAKDE5ml4pwUhQ0OXveus9jqd9/32ngCgi13Q
z9xE0TLoOaYXT6pxNNc5vxc=
=nQ1y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Pan-users] Pan email snag, Duncan, 2003/03/01