openvortex-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Openvortex-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [ALSA - driver 0001138]: error


From: Alien
Subject: Re: [Openvortex-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [ALSA - driver 0001138]: errors when installing au8820 modules
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:13:46 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2

Op woensdag 8 juni 2005 12:18, schreef Takashi Iwai:
> At Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:02:47 +0200,
>
> Alien wrote:
> > this is a patch against some CVS version of a few weeks ago not more than
> > 3 weeks i think...
>
> The patch looks almost fine to me.
>
> Just subtle things:
> > @@ -202,6 +205,10 @@
> >             goto alloc_out;
> >     }
> >
> > +   snd_card_set_dev(card, &pci->dev);
> > +
> > +   snd_card_set_dev(card, &pci->dev);
> > +
> >     *rchip = chip;
>
> Too much :)
>
> > Index: alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvsroot/alsa/alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1
> > diff -u -r1.1 au88x0_eqdata.c
> > --- alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c  9 Mar 2004 11:52:13 -0000       
> > 1.1
> > +++ alsa-kernel/pci/au88x0/au88x0_eqdata.c  7 Jun 2005 17:56:37 -0000
> > @@ -104,7 +104,11 @@
> >  };
> >
> >  /*_rodataba0:*/
> > -static long eq_levels[32] = {
> > +static u16 eq_levels[64] = {
> > +   0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> > +   0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> > +   0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> > +   0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> >     0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> >     0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
> >     0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,
>
> You don't need to define values if the static array is initialize to
> zero.  In this case,
>
>       static u16 eq_levels[64];
>
> would be better.
>
>
> Takashi

you sure that this will initialize to 0 ? i seem to remember that C doesn't 
init arrays to 0... unless there's a memset somewhere, of course, i never 
wrote kernel stuff...

Attachment: pgpimVjhQP7Pa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]