[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build
From: |
Nick |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:27:25 -0700 |
That looks like the output without the exports flag. The command line should be
Dumpbin /exports
Before I said with a dash, not slash.
And it should give the same results on the dll as the lib.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 13, 2014, at 15:12, "Paul Miller" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 6/13/2014 4:43 PM, Nick wrote:
>> I guess I should ask the obvious question, is Iex.lib itself on the link
>> line? If yes, the next thing I would check is if a dumpbin -exports actually
>> lists the symbols the linker complains as missing. If yes, I would look for
>> a zombie copy of the link lib somehow polluting your environment. For
>> example, is an old copy around as part of someone else's sdk? Much as the
>> cuda sdk used to drag around an antique copy of glew, causing endless late
>> night fun until we found the errant libs and got out the flamethrower.
>
> This is weird - dumpbin Iex-2_1.lib doesn't list any symbols at all:
>
> Dump of file Iex-2_1.lib
>
> File Type: LIBRARY
>
> Summary
>
> C3 .debug$S
> 14 .idata$2
> 14 .idata$3
> 8 .idata$4
> 8 .idata$5
> C .idata$6
>
> The projects for IlmBase were generated by cmake-gui, and everything looks ok
> there. I didn't see any options for controlling namespaces or anything.
>
> Other than telling cmake where zlib was, everything seemed to build fine.
>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 14:12, "Paul Miller" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/13/2014 2:50 PM, Nick wrote:
>>>> That happens when you build without the DLL macros set up for export. Have
>>>> a look at IexExport.h and you can follow the breadcrumbs backwards from
>>>> there. I'm not currently set up for windows dev so I can't help much
>>>> beyond that at the moment.
>>>
>>> That's the confusing thing - everything looks right with the DLL macros.
>>>
>>> The IlmBase libraries all have OPENEXR_DLL set, and the appropriate
>>> XXX_EXPORTS set. The relevant XXXExport.h headers all show
>>> XXX_EXPORT_DEFINITION ending up as __declspec(dllexport) where appropriate,
>>> and __declspec(dllimport) when included in IlmImf.
>>>
>>> Anything else worth checking?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 12:34, "Paul Miller" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/10/2014 7:45 AM, Paul Miller wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/30/2014 10:51 AM, Piotr Stanczyk wrote:
>>>>>>> As you can tell the windows platform does not receive a large amount of
>>>>>>> time. I would urge you to go with 2.1.0 and use the cmake scripts rather
>>>>>>> than the solution files. I believe you can generate the son files from
>>>>>>> there should you need to, but they should give you a build for the most
>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed, I would be happy to see the baked sln stuff go away in the
>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks to all who responded. I didn't know there was a cmake-based 2.1 -
>>>>>> that should make things easier.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I've gotten pretty far with the latest 2.1 branch - IlmBase is
>>>>> building with no problems that I can see.
>>>>>
>>>>> But when I'm linking IlmImf, I'm getting hundreds of "unresolved external
>>>>> symbol" errors, such as:
>>>>>
>>>>> 2>ImfTiledMisc.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl Iex::ArgExc::ArgExc(char const *)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden@Z)
>>>>> 2>ImfTiledOutputFile.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl Iex::ArgExc::ArgExc(char const *)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden@Z)
>>>>> 2>ImfTileOffsets.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl Iex::ArgExc::ArgExc(char const *)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden@Z)
>>>>> 2>ImfTimeCode.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl Iex::ArgExc::ArgExc(char const *)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden@Z)
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 2>ImfInputFile.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl IlmThread::Mutex::Mutex(void)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden)
>>>>> 2>ImfMultiPartInputFile.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl IlmThread::Mutex::Mutex(void)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden)
>>>>> 2>ImfAttribute.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>>>>> "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl IlmThread::Mutex::Mutex(void)"
>>>>> (address@hidden@@address@hidden)
>>>>> 2>ImfDeepScanLineInputFile.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external
>>>>> symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl
>>>>> IlmThread::Mutex::Mutex(void)" (address@hidden@@address@hidden)
>>>>> 2>ImfDeepScanLineOutputFile.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external
>>>>> symbol "__declspec(dllimport) public: __cdecl
>>>>> IlmThread::Mutex::Mutex(void)" (address@hidden@@address@hidden)
>>>>> ...
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I pointed the IlmImf linker to the built *.libs from IlmBase, so I don't
>>>>> know what is causing this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've gotten some build tips from Sebastian but I'm using VS2008 here and
>>>>> he's using 2010, and doesn't seem to be getting these errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know what is going on?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Openexr-devel mailing list
>>>>> address@hidden
>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openexr-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, (continued)
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Michel Lerenard, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Sebastian Elsner, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Halfdan Ingvarsson, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Sean Y Chen, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Michel Lerenard, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Brendan Bolles, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Simon Smith, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Thorsten Kaufmann, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Larry Gritz, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, Nick, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build,
Nick <=
- Re: [Openexr-devel] looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build, James Burgess, 2014/06/14