[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++11 now default?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: C++11 now default? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:15:03 -0500 |
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:33:07 -0500, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 20:15, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> I made a couple of small fixes and I am able to build the default branch
>>> with clang 3.7 now. Octave segfaults when printing figures for the
>>> manual, but no compiler errors. Many warnings to tackle another day.
>>
>> I'm also seeing segfaults when printing figures for the manual. I thought
>> this was another Mac problem, so I hadn't mentioned it. The segfaults are
>> reproducible, so if I run make several times, the manual eventually
>> completed.
>>
>> Also, I don't have Omesa, so my crashes occur with GNUPLOT.
>
> The segfault happens for me regardless of toolkit.
>
> Does the following segfault for you?
>
> graphics_toolkit gnuplot
> plot (1)
> findobj -not type figure -not type axes -property units
>
> If so then we are seeing the same thing. See bug #47246.
>
> --
> mike
I ran the example several times. No crashes. The seg-faults aren’t reproducible
for me, so maybe its the same bug or maybe another one.
Ben
- Re: C++11 now default?, (continued)
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/25
- Re: C++11 now default?, Ben Abbott, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/24
- Re: C++11 now default?,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: C++11 now default?, Mike Miller, 2016/02/23
Re: C++11 now default?, John W. Eaton, 2016/02/25
Re: C++11 now default?, Rik, 2016/02/23