Re: specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package]

[Colin Macdonald]

On 30/04/15 00:17, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
> > I have no opinion, sorry. Why should it be renamed?
> because matlab has a laguerreL function, but it does the numerical and
> symbolic part. As of now we could only provide support for the
> numerical one.
> If you think we should go for laguerreL then I need to change the
> function signature and provide an "not implemented" error if th eusers
> tries to use it with symbolic inputs.

I think---but obviously haven't looked, just based on their docs---that 
they have *two functions*.

Symbolic Math Toolbox (SKT) has @sym/laguerreL.m.  Then either core 
matlab or SMT provide @double/laguerreL.

Colin