Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package

[Carnë Draug]

On 25 April 2015 at 15:56, Philip Nienhuis <address@hidden> wrote:
> After Colin has tidied up a bit in the OF specfun package, I'm planning to
> make a new release of it.
>
> The package in the mercurial repo contains two laguerre.m functions, one in
> inst/, the other in devel/
>
> The latter looks to be a bit more elaborate (it contains a demo and perhaps
> more aptly named variables), to compensate for that it is lacking a bit in
> coding style and lacks the one comment line that was present in the original
> (?) one in inst/.
>
> So, any advice about which laguerre.m to retain?

"hg log" tells me this is work from Juan Carbajal who was trying to merge the
existing laguerre with laguerrepoly from the miscellaneous package:

    o  changeset:   144:88d235233c5e
    |  user:        jpicarbajal
    |  date:        Sun Apr 14 19:33:57 2013 +0000
    |  files:       devel/laguerre.m
    |  description:
    |  specfun: unifying laguerre and laguerrepoly

Also, the plan was to simply move the whole specfun package into the
unmaintained section.

https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44533#comment3

Carnë