[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:45:42 +0100 |
On 30 Dec 2013, at 08:40, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 30 Dec 2013, at 07:25, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I don't think we have completely functional installers (including a
>> selection of packages) for Windows or OS X yet. If we are going to
>> distribute "official" binaries, then who will be making them and from
>> where will we distribute them?
>>
>> Should we announce the release now or wait for binaries to be
>> available?
>
> I can try make OS X binaries today.
Yet, I don't see why you should be waiting for the binaries to be ready before
announcing
the release of the new stable release ...
c.
- Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Carnë Draug, 2013/12/29
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, John W. Eaton, 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, c., 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?,
c. <=
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Carnë Draug, 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Mike Miller, 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, c., 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Daniel J Sebald, 2013/12/30
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, PhilipNienhuis, 2013/12/31
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, Lukas Reichlin, 2013/12/31
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, c., 2013/12/31
- Re: Is the 3.8 "release ” official?, PhilipNienhuis, 2013/12/31