[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: edit.m and EDITOR
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: edit.m and EDITOR |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:04:49 -0400 |
2012/4/10 Ben Abbott <address@hidden>:
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>> The problem I'm trying to solve is that EDITOR and edit shouldn't be
>> storing separate variables for the EDITOR command. How do you
>> recommend to solve this instead?
>
>
> I'd forgotten about this conflict.
>
> Should we be using preferences instead ?
>
> i.e. addpref, ispref, setpref, getpref, rmpref
I don't see how those solve this problem... we already have a way to
set the preference, the EDITOR function-variable does this. The
problem is that I don't know how to fix the two copies of the EDITOR
variable in EDITOR and edit.m without breaking part of edit.m's
interface.
- Jordi G. H.
- edit.m and EDITOR, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/04/10
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/10
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/10
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/10
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, Mike Miller, 2012/04/11
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: edit.m and EDITOR, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/10