On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Jaroslav Hajek <
address@hidden> wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I've spent essentially no time on 3.2.x maintenance last couple of months,
> and it seems that the sources have again significantly diverged, but I feel
> like producing one more 3.2.x release before closing the branch and focusing
> on 3.4.0.
> If you have any patches that you'd like to have applied to 3.2.x, please let
> me know. However, I'm not willing to invest nontrivial amounts of time into
> the individual transplants, so unless a patch is smoothly applicable and
> conforms to the binary compatibility policy, someone needs to convert it or
> the bug will stay unfixed in 3.2.x.