[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.1 release?
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.1 release? |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:39:37 +0200 |
Am Mittwoch, den 02.04.2008, 17:31 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> I think we are overdue for a 3.0.1 release, so I've put together a
> test release here:
>
> http://jbrwww.che.wisc.edu/home/jwe/octave-3.0.1a.tar.bz2
>
> Since this release should fix bugs and not introduce them, I'd like to
> have some people try it before releasing and announcing it.
Any chance of applying
2a1cb886ec98 (manpage changes)
to the 3.0 branch?
Thanks
Thomas
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), (continued)
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/04
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/04
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Bill Denney, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
Re: 3.0.1 release?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/02
Re: 3.0.1 release?,
Thomas Weber <=
Re: 3.0.1 release?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/03
Re: 3.0.1 release?, Thomas Treichl, 2008/04/03
Re: 3.0.1 release?, Thomas Weber, 2008/04/07