[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?) |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:48:49 -0400 |
On 2-Apr-2008, John W. Eaton wrote:
| I've added spkron.m and issuperuser.m to the SOURCES lists in the
| appropriate Makefile.in files in the default branch,
Sorry, I hit the send button too soon. I had added spkron.m to the
SOURCES list in scripts/deprecated/Makefile.in when I wrote the above
and assumed that (I know, I shouldn't do that) but now I see that
issuperuser seems only to be a subfunction in pkg.m, so I don't knwo
what is causing the problem for you. I don't see it with either the
default branch or the release-3-0-x branch built from the hg archive
or the 3.0.1a tar file I prepared earlier today.
jwe
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), (continued)
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?),
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03