[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?) |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:28:36 -0400 |
On 2-Apr-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:
| Here's another pair of failures, which I missed. I noticed them when I
| tried a second build.
|
| octave:6> test repmat
| ***** assert(sparse(4,4), repmat(sparse(2,2),[2 2]));
| !!!!! test failed
| error: `spkron' undefined near line 75 column 13
| shared variables {
| x =
|
| 65 66 67
|
| r =
|
| ans(:,:,1) =
|
| 65 66 67 65 66 67
| 65 66 67 65 66 67
|
| ans(:,:,2) =
|
| 65 66 67 65 66 67
| 65 66 67 65 66 67
| }
|
| octave:26> test ver
| ***** test
| result = ver;
| assert (result(1).Name, "Octave")
| assert (result(1).Version, version)
| result = ver ("octave");
| assert (result(1).Name, "Octave")
| assert (result(1).Version, version)
| !!!!! test failed
| error: `issuperuser' undefined near line 210 column 20
| octave:27>
Are you building the release-3-0-x branch, or the default branch?
I've added spkron.m and issuperuser.m to the SOURCES lists in the
appropriate Makefile.in files in the default branch, but I don't see
how that can be the solution if you are building from the hg archive.
It would prevent the files from being placed in a distribution tar
file though...
jwe
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), (continued)
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?),
John W. Eaton <=
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03