[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: graphics future
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: graphics future |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:47:09 -0400 |
On 26-Apr-2007, Shai Ayal wrote:
| While I agree that compatibility is important, and what we don't make
| compatible today will come back at us in the form of bug reports and
| help requests, I think that maybe we should not strive, at this point
| in time, to be compatible with the latest feature set of matlab.
I'm not proposing that we get it 100% compatible for 3.0.
| While group objects make these a LITTLE bit more convenient, I fail to
| see what qualitative added value they have.
It is impossible to implement some fairly common plot types (stem,
bar, hist, stairs) in a compatible way without them.
jwe
- Re: color_radio_property implementation, (continued)
- Re: color_radio_property implementation, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/25
- Re: color_radio_property implementation, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: color_radio_property implementation, Quentin Spencer, 2007/04/26
- Re: color_radio_property implementation, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- graphics future (was: Re: color_radio_property implementation), John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Shai Ayal, 2007/04/26
- Re: graphics future, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/26