Re: message ids for warnings and errors

[Paul Kienzle]

On Dec 9, 2005, at 4:40 AM, Stefan van der Walt wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:38:09PM -0500, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> > The obvious way is to maintain a list of warning
> > names and states for the current function context
> > and run through this list when the function returns.
> > This does mean the majority of functions have to
> > pay for a feature they do not use, so not an ideal
> > solution.
>
> Would it be worthwhile to implement hash-tables in liboctave?  That
> way the performance hit needs to be minimal.

That isn't the issue.  The issue is that in
ov-usr-fn.cc(do_multi_index_op) you would need
to push and pop the set of suppressed warnings
on the unwind protect stack for every function
call even though most functions don't need it.

- Paul