[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use.
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use. |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Feb 2018 20:16:00 -0500 |
>> If we just made it optional then the few people who cared would be
>> required to set CPPFLAGS and/or LDFLAGS appropriately.
>
>True, but `it's POSIX' and that was used for iconv to make it mandatory.
>And optional means the code and the tests have to be that bit more
>complex.
If this was used in more than one tiny location, I'd find this compelling.
But it's not quite the same as our use of iconv(), which happens in a bunch
of places and can be legitimately be argued as core functionality.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Anthony J. Bentley, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Searching the nmh-workers Archive., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use.,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., P Vix, 2018/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use., Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Todd C. Miller, 2018/02/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/02/01