Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?

nmh-workers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?

From:	Ralph Corderoy
Subject:	Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
Date:	Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:22:22 +0000

Hi,

> > > CONFIGURE_ENV=          ac_cv_header_db_h=no \
>
> I think it was for an older version of nmh's configure script.

Todd later pointed out privately that 2005's 0cd75fec removed the need
for the above.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Searching the nmh-workers Archive., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/02/01
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/02/02
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Paul Fox, 2018/02/02
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03
    - Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, David Levine, 2018/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/02/03
  - Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, David Levine, 2018/02/03

Prev by Date: Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use.
Next by Date: Re: [Nmh-workers] slocal(1) and its dbm_open(3) Use.
Previous by thread: Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
Next by thread: Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread