[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] mhshow manpage (was Re: 1.7rc3: mhl(1) man page refers to
From: |
valdis . kletnieks |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] mhshow manpage (was Re: 1.7rc3: mhl(1) man page refers to old mhl.format name |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:11:46 -0400 |
So I'm reading the manpage, and hit this:
Checking the Contents
The -check switch tells mhshow to check each content for an integrity
checksum. If a content has such a checksum (specified as a Content-MD5
header field), then mhshow will attempt to verify the integrity of the
content.
Given the deprecated nature of MD5, should we keep this around? When was the
last time one of these was seen in the wild? Seems like most people who worry
about integrity are PGP-signing with a SHA hash of some variety (hopefully not
SHA-1 :).
pgpscc5var_4d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Nmh-workers] mhshow manpage (was Re: 1.7rc3: mhl(1) man page refers to old mhl.format name,
valdis . kletnieks <=