|
| From: | David Levine |
| Subject: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:03:14 -0400 |
Paul F wrote: > sure, but that's a bug. I'm not sure about that. What if the user has a legitimate reason to use a such a header? And we can't predict all such pseudoheader names out into the future. nmh should squat on the Nmh- namespace to severely minimize this issue. David
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |