[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:03:14 -0400

Paul F wrote:

> sure, but that's a bug.

I'm not sure about that.  What if the user has a legitimate reason
to use a such a header?  And we can't predict all such pseudoheader
names out into the future.  nmh should squat on the Nmh- namespace
to severely minimize this issue.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]