Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7

[Laura Creighton]

In a message of Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:15:40 +0100, Ralph Corderoy writes:
>Hi,
>
>Laura wrote:
>> For instance, I was blissfully unaware of this mailing list and that
>> nmh was ever under active development until a few years ago, and I
>> suspect that there are quite a few others out there who are still in
>> this position.
>
>Consisdering very long-term users, and new users, nmh(7) says, right at
>the very end,
>
>    BUGS
>        If problems are encountered with an nmh program, the problems
>        should be reported to the local maintainers of nmh.  When doing
>        this, the name of the program should be reported, along with the
>        version information for the program.

For what it is worth,

I interpreted this to mean local sysadmins at the site where you are
running nmh, i.e. somebody at Chalmers University, not you people.  If
you want to hear from people, I think you need to be a whole lot more
welcoming.

>
>        To find out what version of an nmh program is being run, invoke
>        the program with the -version switch.  This prints the version
>        of nmh, the host it was compiled on, and the date the program
>        was linked.

This is one place where I would like a link to documentation, at some
master site, (so you can read it even if the docs never made it to
where they are supposed to be for your distro.)

Laura