[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7

From: Laura Creighton
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Starting the final call for features for 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 18:23:24 +0200

In a message of Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:15:40 +0100, Ralph Corderoy writes:
>Laura wrote:
>> For instance, I was blissfully unaware of this mailing list and that
>> nmh was ever under active development until a few years ago, and I
>> suspect that there are quite a few others out there who are still in
>> this position.
>Consisdering very long-term users, and new users, nmh(7) says, right at
>the very end,
>    BUGS
>        If problems are encountered with an nmh program, the problems
>        should be reported to the local maintainers of nmh.  When doing
>        this, the name of the program should be reported, along with the
>        version information for the program.

For what it is worth,

I interpreted this to mean local sysadmins at the site where you are
running nmh, i.e. somebody at Chalmers University, not you people.  If
you want to hear from people, I think you need to be a whole lot more

>        To find out what version of an nmh program is being run, invoke
>        the program with the -version switch.  This prints the version
>        of nmh, the host it was compiled on, and the date the program
>        was linked.

This is one place where I would like a link to documentation, at some
master site, (so you can read it even if the docs never made it to
where they are supposed to be for your distro.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]