[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:03:30 -0700 |
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that your view
> of an IMAP mailbox at least in terms of message numbers is fixed during
> a single IMAP session. I know messages can be added or removed from
> a mailbox and you're get notified in the middle of a session, but I
> can't see why we can't just ignore those messages
IMAP has a somewhat bizarre idea of the transactional state of a mailbox,
primarily in reference to deleted messages and preserving message reference
views across multiple client connections to the same mailbox (aka tombstones).
Think of 'SELECT' as 'BEGIN TRANSACTION' and 'EXPUNGE' as 'COMMIT + BEGIN
TRANSACTION'. Sort of. This is the stuff that drives IMAP server writers to
absinthe.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, chad brown, 2016/03/17
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Jon Steinhart, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, norm, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12