[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:10:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> On 22 July 2014 at 12:31, Bill Wohler <address@hidden>wrote:
>
>> Never mind, since what I was asking for was an amd64 binary snapshot,
>> but that is probably untenable.
>
> I own an amd64 system, so I thought I'd offer Bill a completed build.
Jerry,
You are a gentleman, but I got lucky and nmh compiled (and David, make
check passed all tests), so I'm no longer in need of a binary
distribution.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
Bill Wohler <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/23