[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:08:57 -0400

>To clarify, I'm not suggesting dropping the CMU SASL support.
>What I meant to say is that we should include a light weight SASL
>implementation as I described that would be built iff CMU SASL support
>was not enabled in the build.

I don't necessarily object to someone doing that work ... it's just a)
more work than I think you realize, given that we already have CMU SASL
support and it would have to integrate with that somehow, and b) I think
nowadays getting a CMU SASL library is not a big deal for most platforms
(it either ships with a lot of systems or is easily available via a
packaging system).

So if someone wants to work on it, please feel free.  It's just not something
that will make it onto my personal to-do list.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]