Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?

[David Levine]

Ralph wrote:

> I'd expect nmh users to be Unix users familiar with cat(1).  I'd expect
> it to make sense to them for that alone?
> 
> On the question of whether the option should be named so the default is
> the -no-less version, I don't think that matters.  More important is a
> negative term isn't sought out to make that true so a double-negative
> results when -no is prefixed.

Agreed.  There are some other nmh program switches that default
to their -no form.

David