[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ? |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:44:56 -0400 |
ken wrote:
> As I talked about previously, the last bit for 1.6 is fixing up mhshow.
> Part of this is making it behave more sanely when it comes to multiple
> MIME parts. One thing I wanted to do was make it controllable if you
> want all of the content run under one pager (this would be the default)
> or keep with the current mode of running the pager for every single part.
> However, I'm unsure what to call this new switch. -combined/-nocombined?
> I'm not in love with that, but I can't think of anything better.
> Suggestions?
perhaps -concat/-noconcat ?
----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 49.1 degrees)
- [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/03/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/03/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, David Levine, 2014/03/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Ken Hornstein, 2014/03/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, David Levine, 2014/03/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Paul Fox, 2014/03/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, Mike O'Dell, 2014/03/24
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow flag: -combined ?, bergman, 2014/03/22