[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1

From: norm
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:33:05 -0800

Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden> writes:
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:14 AM, address@hidden wrote:
>> What if you called it mh-1.6alpha, or even mh-1.5omega ?
>Because it isn't.  Until we are actually approaching a release (i.e. in =
>feature freeze) this is just needless make-work for the developers.  If =
>you want a snapshot release, all the tools for you to build one are in =
>the source tree.  And on any form of modern hardware, going from =
>checkout to RPM takes about two minutes.

OK. I gave up. I will try my very best to be patient.

    Norman Shapiro

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]