[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach

From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:43:55 -0500

Ken wrote:

> Well, let me make this alternate proposal:
> - "attach" adds Nmh-Attachment headers as per usual.  Maybe we'll add
>   something like: "attaching foo.pdf to message as application/pdf" so
>   the user can see what MIME type is being used (really, that's all
>   I care about).
> - You can add or not add mhbuild directives to the message if you want.
> - If you add mhbuild directives, you can run "mime" (also, you can run
>   "mime" even if you don't). mhbuild will be in charge of processing
>   Nmh-Attachment headers.

> - If you try to "attach" after a "mime", you get an error.
> - send runs "mhbuild -auto -nodirectives".
> How does that look?  More code rework, but it feels better.  Also,
> with this I think it actually accomplishes what you want (attach +
> inspection).

I like it.

One question:  would it make sense to put the entire mhbuild
directive in the Nmh-Attachment header instead of just the
path?  Users could then edit it as they wish.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]