[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers

From: Paul Fox
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:46:17 -0400

david wrote:
 > Ralph wrote:
 > > Hi Paul,
 > > 
 > > > as a convenience feature when typing negative offsets, "foo:-n" and
 > > > "foo=-n" can be entered as "foo::n" and "foo==n" respectively.
 > > 
 > > I dislike this.  Must be my preference for Python's `one way to do it'
 > > over Perl's `there must still be one more way we haven't added yet'.
 > > :-)
 > Agreed.  In general, I think it's best to minimize the
 > feature set, and therefore testing and documentation.  And
 > it helps reduce confusion between what might some day be
 > similar features given some other enhancement.  And reduce
 > the likelihood of unintended interactions between features,
 > always a concern with nmh.

okay.  i've removed the "stuttered" syntax support, and pushed the


 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 61.0 degrees)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]